Rachel Neumeier

Fantasy and Young Adult Fantasy Author


So, here we are in 2013 —

And you know what I just realized?

That I may need to get moving if I want to be able to nominate / vote on the Hugo this year! The 2013 WorldCon website wasn’t working for me a few months ago when I tried to buy a voting membership, but I expect the problem, whatever it was, has fixed itself in the interim. And I do want to be eligible to vote, because though I don’t expect to attend WorldCon this year, I really enjoyed reading and arguing about the nominees last year. Plus, my brother commented that amazingly enough Hugo nominees seemed better than average, as two of his favorite books last year were nominees. AMONG OTHERS and LEVIATHAN WAKES. Neither of those made my top ten for the year, but they both were indeed really good.

Plus! The novellas last year were REALLY good. And I would NEVER HAVE READ THEM if not for the Hugo Voter’s packet. Since I don’t seek out short stories or novellas, I wouldn’t even have known they existed except for the Hugo Voter’s packet. As it is, hey, I’ve got ’em on my hard drive right here, which is great.

The deadline for buying a voting membership in time to nominate works for consideration is Jan 31st. I think I’m actually eligible to nominate because of buying last year’s Hugo membership, but I’d better check! I’m sure you all know that anybody at all can buy a voting membership and vote on the Hugo, right? Yes, it costs $60, but on the other hand, you do get the Hugo’s Voter Packet, which is a free electronic packet containing all the finalists, provided by the publishers. This means that you can read ALL the Hugo finalists without breaking a huge gaping hole in your book budget. Not to be sneezed at, right?

Last year I read all the novels, the novellas, the novelettes, and the short stories. I watched some of the movies, but none of the short-form visual stuff. I didn’t watch the podcasts and I didn’t look up the artists and I didn’t know anything about the fan awards. This year I want to include at least the artists in my vote, and maybe the podcasts, and MAYBE even the films. You get the podcasts in the Voter’s Packet, so no need to go track them down.

So! Supposing you all say WOW THIS SOUNDS LIKE FUN, what books came out in 2012 that you might like to nominate?

The problem is that I personally NEVER get anything like caught up with current titles, not even the very highly recommended titles, because, well, there just aren’t enough hours in the day. I’m sure you feel the same way.

I have some predictions, though. Whether you or I nominate them or not, the final set of nominees will include: RAILSEA by China Mieville and THE KILLING MOON and/or THE SHADOWED SUN by NK Jemisen. I have these on my TBR pile downstairs, and after realizing they were going to be eligible for the Hugo this year, I moved them to the top. I am really pretty sure to love them all. I need to read them! But probably not much before it is actually time to vote.

But what titles are there that may well be fighting for their share of well-deserved nominating votes? The other 2012 titles I have downstairs are THE SERPENT SEA by Martha Wells, which you know I loved; and THE RAVEN BOYS by Stiefvater, which I know is the first of a series — I am not normally inclined to vote for any part of a seires until the series is completely finished — and RUINS by Orson Scott Card. Which is the second book of a series, and I sort of expect there is a third book coming, but I don’t know for sure.

I know the Book Smugglers have already said they’re nominating THREE PARTS DEAD by Max Gladstone, SEER OF SEVENWATERS by Juliet Marillier, and A FACE LIKE GLASS by Frances Hardinge, none of which I have read. I really loved the first book of the Sevenwaters series and frankly had not realized there were so many more set in that universe. Frances Hardinge had been on my radar because everyone keeps insisting I MUST try her, and yes, yes, I believe you all, but back to the thing about limited hours.

What else ought to be nominated?

And . . . let me just mention here . . . very modestly at the very end of this post . . . but (clears throat): HOUSE OF SHADOWS also came out in 2012 and is eligible. Just sayin’.

Please Feel Free to Share:


Recent listening: REDSHIRTS

Okay, this review over at The Book Smugglers didn’t encourage me to run out and get the book. Though actually, if you check out this list, you’ll see that Thea went on to include it on her honorable mention list for 2012. (Also HOUSE OF SHADOWS, which I know, I mentioned before, but hey.) To summarize Thea’s review very very briefly: She loved REDSHIRTS but hated the three short stories included as codas after the main book, considering them self-indulgent and not in keeping with the spirit of the zany novel that precedes them.

Well, I got this in audio format because Audible was offering a 2-for-1 sale right before Christmas, and when I needed to drive to St Louis . . . um . . . eight times? in quick succession, this is one of the books I choose to listen to. Thus finding out, btw, that one cd will last exactly long enough to get from my house to the reproductive vet, which is a good thing to know.

And I don’t know. I mean, I do know about the main story! REDSHIRTS is hilarious, fast-paced, zippy, and definitely loads of fun as an audiobook. I laughed out loud many times while listening to it. I loved the way Ensign Dahl gradually figured out what was going on with his ship being caught up in “The Narrative” and I loved the way he used The Narrative to beat itself. I definitely don’t want to say too much about this because I would hate to spoil all the clever details for anybody, but trust me on this, this is a delightful story and a perfect choice for a longish (say, six hour) drive.

But I hadn’t realized that it is only four cds long and that the other two cds were the short stories. Naturally I listened to them – I mean, regardless of Thea’s review, when you’re driving you’re kind of a captive audience. And yes, those short stories really are a lot more serious in tone than the novel, but I didn’t hate them. In particular, I quite liked the one about Jenkin’s wife. If any of you have read this yet, what did you think of the coda stories?

Please Feel Free to Share:

Blog / The Best Cookies In The World

More Adventurous Cookies

I’m just posting a couple at a time because, hey, don’t want to overwhelm everyone with cool possible recipes. But check these out:


I admit that my first attempt at sweet potato cookies were a major flop. I knew exactly the texture I wanted: cakey and soft and pillowy. What I got was far too moist and sticky, a total waste of excellent chocolate. I’d tried a variation on a pumpkin cookie, but I was so disappointed in the result that I switched completely to a recipe that originally used sour cream, for which I substituted an equal amount of cooked pureed sweet potato. Then I changed the spicing and added fresh grated ginger and chopped bittersweet chocolate and, well, here you go:

4 ½ C. flour
4 tsp baking powder
½ tsp baking soda
½ tsp salt
1 tsp nutmeg, preferably freshly grated
½ tsp ground ginger
¼ tsp cayenne
½ C. margarine – this will give a softer, more cake-like texture than butter – I used a brand that is only about 50% fat, which is going to give an even softer texture.
8 oz cream cheese – again, this helps give a soft texture
2 C. sugar
2 eggs
1 C. cooked pureed sweet potato, or I imagine pumpkin would be fine.
2 tsp grated fresh ginger
1 ½ C. finely chopped bittersweet chocolate, or you can use mini chocolate chips. Or, for that matter, you can leave out the chocolate. I thought these cookies were really good without chocolate. I made them without chocolate first, see, because I was afraid of wasting more great chocolate on another flop. But this version was fine.

6 oz cream cheese
3 C. powdered sugar
½ Tbsp grated fresh ginger
½ C. minced crystallized ginger

Combine the dry ingredients. Cream the margarine and cream cheese with the sugar. Beat in the eggs, sweet potato, and grated ginger. Stir in the flour mixture. Chill at least one hour.

Roll out the dough 3/8 inch thick (measure it, this is thicker than you may expect). Even after chilling, the dough will be soft. Roll it out with a light touch, adding as little extra flour as possible – rolling it out thick will help here. But don’t be obsessive about it, they’ll be fine if you do have to use a bit more flour. Cut out cookies with a 3 inch round cookie or biscuit cutter and place on parchment-lined baking sheets. Re-roll the scraps and cut out more cookies. Was quite pleased with the texture of these cookies even after the dough had been re-rolled three times. Anyway, when you get as many cookies cut out as possible, bake at 350 degrees for about 15 minutes, until set and just browned on the bottom. Cool on sheets for a few minutes and then cool completely on racks.

Combine the filling ingredients, adding enough powdered sugar to make a decently thick and spreadable filling, and assemble the cookies.


For these, I started with a chocolate-hazelnut cookie I found online, which had garnered comments such as “More like a dog biscuit than a cookie.” Obviously lots of room for improvement there! I punched up the sugar a lot and added English Toffee Bits. I also made a kind of homemade Nutella as the filling, but nothing stops you from using actual Nutella, which I think would work great. Also,I know hazelnuts are super expensive; I think I’ll try these again with walnuts and I bet that will work just fine. If you try this recipe with some other kind of nut, let me know how it works out!

1 C. butter
½ C. sugar
½ C. brown sugar
¼ tsp salt
1 egg
1 Tbsp Frangelico, or ½ tsp hazelnut extract, or hey, both – I didn’t even know there was such a thing as hazelnut extract until I happened to fortuitously stumble across it at the right moment.
½ tsp vanilla
4 Tbsp cocoa
1 ¾ C. flour
2 ¼ C. chopped toasted hazelnuts, divided
½ C. English Toffee Bits

If you want to make your own hazelnut filling:

1 C. toasted hazelnuts
2 Tbsp sugar
8 oz bittersweet chocolate
¼ C. butter
½ C. cream – I used coconut milk because of contest rules, but really I suggest you just use cream.
2 tsp Frangelico or ¼ tsp hazelnut extract

If you have untoasted hazelnuts, toast them: spread them in a single layer on a baking sheet and bake at 350 degrees for 13-18 minutes, until decidedly golden in color, shaking occasionally. Cool. Rub off skins by wrapping in a kitchen towel and rubbing briskly.

Make the hazelnut filling: Combine the hazelnuts with the sugar in a food processor and grind into a gritty paste. Melt the chocolate with the butter. Whisk the cream into the chocolate mixture. Whisk in Frangelico and/or the hazelnut extract. Whisk in the nut paste. Chill until thickened.

Make the cookies: Cream the butter and sugar. Beat in the salt, the egg, the Frangelico and / or hazelnut extract, the vanilla, and the cocoa powder. Stir in the flour and 1 ½ C. chopped nuts and the toffee bits. Spoon down the middle of two sheets of plastic wrap. Use the plastic wrap to help you form the dough into two logs (which is a bit soft, but you can get it shaped into logs if you work at it for a minute). Freeze the logs overnight. Roll each log in the remaining chopped nuts. Slice ¼ inch thick and place on parchment-lined baking sheets. Bake at 375 degrees for 6-8 minutes, just until set. Try not to overbake. Cool a minute or so on the sheets, then cool completely on racks.

Assemble into sandwich cookies. Unusually for sandwich cookies, I think these are significantly better the day they are assembled, while the toffee bits retain some crunch. If I make them again, I will keep the filling separate and assemble cookies right before serving.

Please Feel Free to Share:


And! A tidbit of good news I almost forgot!

Over at The Book Smugglers? Scroll WAYYYY down, and you will find that HOUSE OF SHADOWS made Thea’s list for Honorable Mentions for 2012.

That’s H of S’s second appearance on a best-of list at The Book Smugglers during their Smugglivus . . . that I know of. I kind of fell behind in reading ALL the Smugglivus posts. Though I read enough that my wishlist kind of exploded.

Please Feel Free to Share:

Blog / The Best Cookies In The World

Adventurous Cookies

I wound up submitting nine cookie recipes for the Scharffen Berger Adventure Coookie Contest – I couldn’t quite get the caramel filling to work out or I would have submitted a variation of one of these, making ten recipes, which was the maximum allowed. But hey, coming up with nine good recipes in one month, I’m pretty happy with that. One took three tries before I thought it was okay to submit, but some I did hit on the first try.

I suspect most entries must surely come from professionals, so I don’t know that any of my recipes have much of a chance – but hey, I did develop some great recipes! So it was definitely worth the trouble to enter. Next year I will try to remember to check out this contest in October, which is when it started this year. Three months to work on recipes would be much better than trying to do it all in one month!

Here are the cookies I submitted:

Pine Nut Orange Florentines
Chocolate-Coconut Paciencia
Chocolate-Sweet Potato-Ginger Pillows
Gingerbread-Marshmallow Bars
Chocolate Pinenut Orange Spirals
Death By Hazelnut Chocolate Cookies
Mayan End-Of-The-World Chocolate Cookies
Aztec Gold Cookies
And (my favorite) Taste For Adventure Triple Ginger Chocolate Cookies

So! I know some of you bake! Here are the first couple recipes! If you try any of them, I’d be interested in what you think.


For this cookie, I just took an ordinary Florentine-style cookie, substituted chopped pine nuts for sliced almonds, added Grand Marnier and orange zest – I think orange goes well with pine nuts and, of course, chocolate. Then I used melted chocolate to sandwich the cookies together. These didn’t turn out super-fancy because it was hard to get the cookies perfectly round – if I was trying it again, I’d chop the pine nuts a bit finer, chill the dough, and see if I could form the dough into little tiny balls rather than trying to drop the dough on the cookie sheets. If you try this, let me know how they come out.

½ C. butter
2/3 C. sugar
2 Tbsp cream
2 Tbsp corn syrup
1/3 C. all-purpose flour
½ tsp vanilla
2 tsp orange liqueur such as Grand Marnier
¼ tsp orange extract
2 Tbsp orange zest
1 C. finely chopped pine nuts (or other nuts – I actually prefer almost every other kind of nut to pine nuts. I’d probably use walnuts here if I did this again, but hey, I’m not the boss of you. Sliced almonds or pecans or whatever would be great, but take it from me, you aren’t going to be able to roll the dough into neat balls if you use sliced almonds, which are too pointy.
1 C. bittersweet chocolate, melted

Combine the butter, sugar, cream, and corn syrup in a saucepan. Heat until mixture reaches 230 degrees, stirring frequently. Remove from heat and stir in flour and all the orange flavorings. Stir in the chopped nuts.

Drop onto parchment-lined baking sheets by rounded ½ tsp (or chill dough and roll into tiny balls). Bake at 350 degrees for 8-11 minutes, until caramelized and lightly browned. Cool on the paper. When the cookies are cool, they will lift right off the paper.

Melt the chocolate. Brush chocolate on the underside of one cookie and sandwich with another cookie of similar size and shape. If you like, drizzle more melted chocolate across the tops of the sandwich cookies.


Paciencia are Filipino meringue cookies. I simply substituted cocoa powder for a bit of the flour – you substitute 2 Tbsp cocoa for every Tbsp flour you take out – and then I added coconut extract, then made a chocolate ganache with coconut milk and coconut extract. I got these to work perfectly once, but the second time I couldn’t get the egg whites to whip stiff enough. It might, I admit, have been lack of patience. I mean, these cookies get their name for a reason. Below, I’ll provide every possible suggestion for getting the egg whites to whip really stiff. On a day when you’re feeling patient, you really should try these – they’re quite addictive when they work.

2 egg whites
½ C. sugar
¼ tsp coconut extract
¼ C. + 1 Tbsp flour
2 Tbsp cocoa powder
1/8 tsp baking powder

6 oz bittersweet chocolate
4 oz thick coconut milk from the top of an unshaken can, or 4 oz heavy cream – it doesn’t make any difference, I just used the coconut milk because it was an “adventure” ingredient.
1 tsp coconut extract

Beat the egg whites until quite stiff. Don’t use totally fresh eggs – they should be at least a week old. Bring the egg whites to room temperature before you beat them – leave them sitting in the bowl for at least half an hour before you start beating them, and an hour is better. You know you mustn’t have a speck of yolk in the egg whites, right? Before you start, you might wash the beaters and bowl in hot soapy water even if they’re already clean, just to make absolutely sure there’s not a trace of grease anywhere. But then give everything plenty of time to dry completely because even a drop of water can interfere with egg whites whipping. I have NEVER had trouble whipping egg whites until these cookies, so don’t let me scare you away from trying them. I think all the sugar and stuff interferes a lot more than just whipping the egg whites by themselves.

So, as I said, beat the egg whites until quite stiff before you start to add the sugar. I think that’s where I went wrong, starting to add the sugar before the egg whites were stiff. You can tell whether the egg whites are stiff by switching off the mixer and lifting the beaters straight up, btw – the peaks left in behind in the egg whites should stand up straight, not fold over. Standing up straight means you have whipped the egg whites to “stiff peaks”.

Okay! Gradually beat in the sugar, a Tbsp at a time. Only when you have stiff peaks AND all the sugar has been added should you beat in the coconut extract. Now: combine the flour, cocoa powder, and baking powder and beat that in. You should still have stiff peaks. If the mixture has partially collapsed again, beat it some more. I swear, the first time I made these the whole process only took about ten minutes.

Spoon the batter into a pastry bag (or a zip lock bag with the tip of one corner cut off) and pipe quarter-sized mounds onto parchment-lined baking sheets. Bake at 400 degrees until lightly toasted, 12-15 minutes, trading the positions of the baking sheets halfway through to compensate for any hot spots in your oven. Cool the cookies on the baking sheets. When cool, the cookies will lift right off the parchment paper.

Make the ganache: heat the coconut milk or cream with the chocolate in your microwave and stir until smooth. Stir in the coconut extract. Set the ganache aside until it thickens, about 30 to 40 minutes. Assemble sandwich cookies, but don’t eat any yet – they are super-crisp and will be much better if you continue with the patience. Store the cookies overnight at room temp in an air-tight container. NOW pick up a good book and settle down with these softened, chewy cookies for a real treat – they are quite wonderful.

Okay, you’ll find the next cookie recipes I’ll post will be much more foolproof!

Please Feel Free to Share:


Recent reading: In the Land of Invented Languages

Which is a nonfiction book by Arika Okrent.

What an interesting name, isn’t it? I mean the author’s name. Arika Okrent. Doesn’t that seem like a great name for a linguist?

Actually, Okrent has a double PhD, in linguistics and psychology, and it sure shows in this book. I got it for Christmas, and it turned out to be fascinating, a great book to start off the new year. It’s exactly what the title says it is: a book about invented languages – well, no, actually, it’s a book about the kinds of people who invent languages, and about what they’re trying to achieve when they invent a language, and about what features make natural languages succeed when (nearly) all artificial languages are complete failures. It’s also really well written and just fun to read.

Do you have any idea how many people have sat down throughout history and invented their own language? Hundreds and hundreds, it turns out – maybe thousands. “The nine hundred languages, over nine hundred years, we do have evidence for,” Okrent says, “suggest that the urge to invent languages is as old and persistent as language itself.” Wow. Who knew?

Apparently the most common motivations for inventing a language are:

a) To improve on existing languages – to design a language that is logical and consistent and unambiguous and which reveals the Truth of things – and then to convert everybody to your wonderful language.
b) To encourage universal understanding among peoples and thus create world peace.
c) To play with language as a game and hobby.

I bet it won’t surprise you to learn that the only artificial languages that have ever succeeded at all – that people have ever voluntarily learned and spoken and translated Hamlet into – belong to the third type.

Language inventers who go in with the intention to design a new language that everybody will swoon over and learn and give up their own languages for, a new language that will clarify the true nature of everything in the universe and prevent misunderstandings and promote world peace – yeah, those people are pretty much all nuts. It’s like the language inventor gets consumed by some odd combination of delusions of grandeur and obsessiveness. This does not lead to good things for the poor language inventors, who often become quite bitter when things don’t work out as they imagined.

None of that applies, however, to languages designed for fun – obviously Tolkien falls into this group – or to be fun things to participate in. There are two successful artificial languages, it turns out – I mean, languages normal people can actually learn and hold a conversation in. You know what those are? Yeah, Esperanto (Okrent spends plenty of time on Esperanto, the greatest success story in the world of invented languages), but what do you think the other one is? Right, you got it – Klingon. That strikes me as kind of wonderful. Though I sure don’t plan to learn Klingon, which is apparently really difficult. I mean, I had a hard enough time with French in high school, so count me out for Klingon. But after reading Okrent’s book, I can see why some people get absorbed in the language as a hobby.

The guy who designed Klingon, Marc Okrand, is a linguist who got roped in for the job by Paramont. He worked out a full grammar, and it’s a wonderful job: believable, alien, difficult, flexible. Klingon is an agglutinating language that tags all kinds of prefixes and suffixes onto base words – it has twenty-six noun suffixes, twenty-nine pronominal prefixes, thirty-six verb suffixes, on and on. It has features similar to things in Italian, Turkish, Korean, Native American languages – all kinds of stuff that seems really strange if English is your native language. Okrent says the language came out “completely believable as a language, but somehow very, very odd.”

Here’s a Klingon proverb, just as an example: Dubotchugh yIpummoH – If it’s in your way, knock it down. Or literally, Du (it-you) bot (block) chugh (if) yI (imperative) pum (fall) moH (cause).

Isn’t that interesting? No, come on, isn’t it?

Compare that to this, possibly my favorite in the get-real world of invented languages:

hi jun pa bol, “ciq ven! – gozi ben gozi fu bau han ceq, kai han turo kai toilsa xaq hu sta skai. hikai gozi fu tenho feimkian por sam ke gozi be fintir ko kujai hu sta to dunia.”

Which means: “and letter-pronoun-j past speak, “invite come! I-you future build one city, and one tower and letter-pronoun-t separator-particle top which is-located-in-sky. And you-I future have-become fame-name-for-prevent that I-you passive spread-throw to all-place which is-located-in the world.”

Got that? No? Well, it started off as “Let us build a city with a tower whose top may reach unto Heaven, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”

That one is from a language called Ceqli, invented in the nineties, and apparently all that I-you pronoun-t stuff is the best it can do with the story of Babel. Wow, I’m sure that one will convert everyone away from their native languages. I do find it hard to imagine that language inventers actually think their languages are going to sweep the world, but evidently they often do think so.

And there are plenty of languages that are harder to pronounce, or harder to understand, or both. Okrent spends quite a bit of time on something called Philosophical Language, invented by John Wilkins in the sixteen hundreds, in which the words weren’t supposed to stand for things, they were actually supposed to define things. Like, everything in the universe. You couldn’t use a word without knowing exactly what you meant. Okrent says she “I settled in for a long weekend with [Wilkin’s Philosophical Language] . . . I emerged blinking and staggering, unsure of whether any word in any language meant anything at all.”

But you know what she realized, after working with Wilkin’s huge tome on his language and its concepts? Not that a conceptual language of this kind is totally impossible, she already knew that. No, she realized that Wilkins might not have invented a usuable language, but he had invented a thesaurus. How about that?

One more quick note: an otherwise completely unusable pictorial language called Blissymbolics (invented by a guy named Charles Bliss) actually is used today to communicate with children with cerebral palsy and teach them written English so they can communicate with anybody, when before they really couldn’t communicate with anybody. Bliss himself was definitely nutty and actually tried to prevent the rehab center from using his language (since they were “doing it all wrong”), but still, how many of us can say we’ve done something as important as open a doorway for communication with otherwise mute children?

Anyway, a great book.

This is a really neat book, an excellent choice to start off the new year.

Please Feel Free to Share:


Amazing how fast Christmas Break is speeding by!

I mean, already half gone! Wow. And have I actually generated new pages for the WIP manuscript on which I intended to make progress?

Well . . . no. I must admit, no.

On the other hand! I bred one of my girls three days before Christmas and one two days after Christmas! So, whew, glad that’s over. The tornado in Mobile, AL? I am sorry for anybody whose house got flattened, but for me, the important thing is the weather didn’t stop Fed Ex from delivering the stud dog’s, um, contribution. Winter does add a little more excitement to getting all these things arranged.

So, but! That’s all done.

Just as a Gosh-Wow-Don’t-They-Just-Look-Artificial, here’s Teddy, the dog I choose for Kenya. His full name is CKCSC and AKC Ch Truluv Kiss N Tell at Jayba.


And here’s The Prez, Adora’s long-distance boyfriend.

Seriously, aren’t they both so cute they really do look artificial? Plus, they’re both around eight and have all their health certifications in order — I’m looking forward (with luck) to beautiful, healthy, glamorous puppies that will live practically forever and will certainly not suffer from MVD, mitral valve defect, which is the bane of the breed.

A month or so until I know whether the girls caught, and in the meantime, I should be a WHOLE LOT less distracted.

I do expect to be revising one . . . or maybe two . . . manuscripts again. Hopefully not in a major way, hopefully nothing that will take too long. But you know what? Even if I do need another round of revisions, I am GOING TO WRITE SOMETHING NEW FIRST. I am sick and tired of revisions. New pages! That is the antidote to writing boredom. Or so I expect. Fifty pages in fifteen days: that shouldn’t be too hard.

Okay! Hope the rest of you are having either relaxing or productive Christmases, whichever you prefer.

Please Feel Free to Share:


And a unexpected Christmas surprise for me!

this entryHey! You know The Book Smugglers?

Well, you should definitely go check out this entry:

Kristen at The Fantasy Book Cafe picked HOUSE OF SHADOWS as one of her six favorite books for 2012!


Plus, the other ones Kristen recommends sound great! I’m adding all of ’em to my wishlist right now, on the grounds that she clearly has excellent taste.

Lots of other good posts over at The Book Smugglers, but you already know that, right?

Please Feel Free to Share:


Other people are probably busy for Christmas too —

But probably I am the ONLY PERSON in the whole world who is busy not because of Christmas per se, but because two of my girls came into season just in time for Christmas. Because I’m doing artificial inseminations for them, this means daily blood tests to measure progesterone and/or LH levels, so as to find the exact right day for breeding.

So! Kenya is done! She should hopefully be pregnant as of yesterday! Yay! But for Adora, I seriously need to drive to the repro clinic in St Louis . . . let’s see . . . the day before yesterday, yesterday, today (I’m there right now), Tuesday, and I’m guessing on Thursday and Saturday next week. (That’s an hour and a half one way.) You will notice that “Tuesday” is in fact Christmas Day. I have to say, the repro vet is on my Christmas cookie list for sure. Can you imagine disarranging your Christmas by coming in specially to do blood tests on somebody’s dog?

Three cheers for reproductive specialists who REALLY CARE about doing things right! The Christmas cookie plate I brought today has about 15 kinds of cookies on it. I should be able to bring a completely different assortment on Christmas Day, since I have lots of kinds of cookies frozen over at my mother’s house (my freezer is totally packed.)

Oh, hey, and update! Just this minute found out that Adora’s very first LH test came back positive. How about that? Now we can set the breeding dates with confidence and with no need after all to upset anybody’s Christmas plans. Amazing cooperation from Adora and the universe at large.

Okay! So, a little obsessive about the dog thing right now. But! I have indeed also revised MOUNTAIN and think I will send it to my agent again after Christmas — obviously no rush, can’t imagine she’d want it to day. After the dog thing calms down, late next week probably, I should be able to rack up the words on the new manuscript, which will be satisfying.

Can’t believe how fast this Christmas Break is going. Amazing. And I still need to test out one recipe for the cookie contest. Plus four kinds of my family’s favorite cookies are still waiting to be made, too.


Please Feel Free to Share:


I have a sudden mad urge —

To write a Sarah Addison Allen novel.

I just finished THE SUGAR QUEEN, which has a fabulous cover, btw. I mean this cover — I know there are other editions, but this is the cover I like:

And this morning I read the first two paragraphs of GARDEN SPELLS. Love it!

“Every smiley moon, without fail, Claire dreamed of her childhood. She always tried to stay awake those nights when the stars winked and the moon was just a cresting sliver smiling provocatively down at the world, the way pretty women on vintage billboards used to smile as they sold cigarettes and limeade. On those nights in the summer, Claire would garden by the light of the solar-powered footpath lamps, weeding and trimming the night bloomers — the moon vine and the angel’s trumpet, the night jasmine and the flowering tobacco. These weren’t a part of the Waverly legacy of edible flowers, but sleepless as she often was, Claire had added flowers to the garden to give herself something to do at night when she was so wound up that frustration singed the edge of her nightgown and she set tiny fires with her fingertips.”

Okay, can you imagine a more perfect beginning to a novel? I am dying to write a novel where frustration makes your fingertips catch fire, where the scent of baking cakes whispers an invitation to lost loves, where the wallpaper changes according to your mood . . . and where the mistakes you made in high school can be redeemed, rather than ruining your adult life.

Maybe I’ll take a stab at it one of these years.

Please Feel Free to Share: