Writing a novel is “terrifying,” it says here

From Writer Unboxed: When You Are Your Own Antagonist

First paragraph: There is nothing trivial about writing a novel. Regardless of the surface appearance of the story, its genre, its apparent complexity or simplicity, its length, or its intended audience, to create a story is to create a universe. And an act of creation is at its core, terrifying.

Wow, does that look overwrought.

I’m trying to think of appropriate adverbs for the prior sentence. Let me see. How about this:

Wow, does that look astoundingly, stupendously, egregiously overwrought.

The post goes on: What if it’s terrible? What if no one reads it? What if it doesn’t sell? What if no one likes it? What if no one likes me? The post then recommends hope as an antidote to fear, and that’s all very well, but how about this as an alternative:

Writing a novel isn’t terrifying.

Honestly, I want to take this author out for hot chocolate, plonk a friendly spaniel in her lap, and say, “Listen, don’t take all this so seriously. Pet the puppy! Relax! Enjoy writing it! Enjoy discovering how you write! You can worry about whether the novel is any good or whether people will like it later, after it’s finished. And if you decide it’s not that great, so what? Put it aside and write something else.”

***

How many of you have written a book, or some part of a book? How did you feel about it? I’m just wondering. When I started writing, I was in grad school and I was doing it just kind of … to do it. For fun, I suppose. To speed up my typing (real reason) and because I’d read a novel that annoyed me (don’t remember which novel, sorry).

I wasn’t thinking, “What if it’s not good enough to get published?” I wasn’t thinking of it that way at all, just as something to play with. I put it down for months at a time, without feeling bad about that, because so what?

Now, looking back on this period, I wonder how much of that was just me and how much of that was the complete absence of nonstop advice about writing and the total absence of self-publishing as a thing. (All right, near total, you know what I mean.) I really can’t tell. I have never, not once, taken writing advice seriously. I have always, right from the beginning, just opened up novels to see how authors handled something or other, whatever I was trying to do. I didn’t want anybody to critique anything. I didn’t want to show it to people. I mean, not before it was finished. So … maybe the ocean of writing advice wouldn’t have distracted or bothered me. I’m not sure.

I do sort of suspect that it might have been highly beneficial not to have the easy option of sure, just throw it out there, why not that is the default right now. (I’m pretty sure this is the default? An assumption that since you’ve started a novel, you must finish it and self-publish it? Or at least an assumption that if you have finished a novel, you ought to publish it?) I wonder if the easy option to self-publish anything you want might have led to this sort of overwrought advice that takes writing so seriously, like you have to do it right and make it work or … what? Or it’s not worth doing, I guess.

I would say that if you don’t enjoy writing, there are lots of other worthwhile hobbies. There are times when writing is unavoidably stressful, I do think that’s true. Those times occur when you hand the finished book to a reader and wait for feedback, or when you hit publish and wait for reviews. I’m usually a bit tense at those moments. “A bit tense” isn’t “terrified,” and if I were terrified for any large proportion of the whole writing and publishing process, I’d do something else.

***

Also, I realize some people just are very histrionic in their approach to everything and declare they’re terrified when they’re nervous. I don’t really get that, but I sort of hope that’s what the author of the linked post means: that she is mildly nervous about writing, not terrified. But she sounds like she takes the whole thing way too seriously.

People have been telling stories since the Stone Age, if not before, and honestly, we’re pretty good at it. Don’t say, “To create a story is to create a universe.” No, it isn’t. It’s a story. Relax and tell it.

Please Feel Free to Share:

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

11 thoughts on “Writing a novel is “terrifying,” it says here”

  1. Yeah, wow, if I found writing novels to be that terrifying, I would never do it! Of course I hope that someday I get my work out into the world, but honestly I write for myself, because I have stories I want to write (or, you know, I come down with a case of hubris after reading a story I dislike and think ‘I could totally write that better’).

  2. E.C., that particular thought — I could do better — is so frequently true for so many authors who started writing for that reason, that I don’t think it counts as hubris at all. Even if the belief is wrong, it’s probably justifiable — and a lot of the time, it’s not wrong.

    As you may guess, I did think the same thing when I wrote my very first giant fantasy trilogy. I was right even at the time: it was better — at least in some ways — than the book I’d been reading when I thought I could do better. Worse in other ways, I grant.

  3. Overwrought is putting it politely! I’m 130k words into writing my first novel and it’s not at all terrifying. Sometimes it’s difficult and I get stuck, but that’s different. I guess it helps that I understand that writing is a skill which needs to be practiced and anyone’s first effort at anything is likely to be flawed. I daydream about publishing it but realistically it’s probably a trunk novel.

    As it happens, the novel is kind of inspired by the black dog books – have you ever read something and thought ‘I liked the idea but I would have taken it in a completely different direction’? I had that reaction and decided to try.

  4. Rachel Neumeier

    Yes, absolutely! All the time, Rowan! I’m happy to serve as that kind of inspiration and very curious about the direction you’re taking your story.

  5. It wasn’t just Black Dog, it was books like the Mercy Thomson series by Patricia Briggs too – books where the authorities find out about the supernatural after believing it doesn’t exist. And then there’s a period of adjustment but ultimately the werewolves end up living approximately in peace with a government that more-or-less treats them as citizens. And I’ve never quite believed that humans generally and the US specifically were that tolerant.

    Then the thing that triggered a light bulb in my brain was the bit in Black Dog 3 where Natividad casually hides a helicopter with tracking devices from people who are actively looking for it. You didn’t follow up on that, because you wanted a plot where everyone ended up working together, but I was thinking hmmmm. If Natividad can do that, could she make it so a military base didn’t notice an enemy before it attacked them? Could the black dogs steal a warship, since the Navy don’t have silver bullets, then bombard targets with impunity because the government can’t find them till they open fire?

    So in my WIP, after the masquerade ends, the supernatural creatures try to get along with the authorities, find that’s impossible, get dragged into a shooting war, and surprise everyone including themselves by winning it.

    It was originally a satire of the war on terror, from the point of view of random Muslims/werewolves who are now viewed with deep suspicion and labelled terrorists/monsters by a government that isn’t interested in evidence that it’s got things wrong, but given current events, I suspect the satire is going to be very timely. And I’m wondering if I can arrange for the, ahem, entirely fictitious President Orange to get eaten by the werewolves he bombed.

  6. Rachel Neumeier

    Interesting! Magic-as-weapon comes to the fore in a completely different way.

    I’m a committed believer in the idea that the author can make anything plausible if she tries, so I’m sure you’ll come up with a way to make that happen!

  7. Giggle. The “I could do better…” was the impetus for my first fanfic. Honestly, if you’re going to bring Terry Pratchett’s Death into the Harry Potter universe to have him destroy the Resurrection Stone after all the action was over… but NOT do it just a tiny little bit sooner and have him encounter Lord Voldemort face to face WHILST DESTROYING IT, given how *important* it was to Lord Voldemort… well. Cue insanity as I decided I Could Do Way Better with this basic premise. (And I did, even if I do say so myself.)

  8. Heather, I’m now thinking that honestly, bringing Pratchett’s Death into practically any universe might be a fun thing to do. And the villain of the original story should certainly encounter Death face to face, or what is even the point?

  9. Rachel, you’ve got me thinking of Pratchett’s Death… imported into Death’s Lady. The mind boggles and rejects the notion entirely. What WOULD Tenai have been had Lord Death been Pratchett’s version?! No, no, no. Definitely not.

    BTW, it’s “Death’s Horcrux” by catzetier, if you need a two-chapter laugh. The plot is literally just there to hang the jokes off of…

  10. Thanks, I’ll definitely read that one! If anybody else wants to, here’s the link.

    Favorite line –> AT LEAST EBENEEZER SCROOGE COULD BLAME HIS PARENTS FOR HIS FAINTLY RIDICULOUS NAME, OR AT LEAST HIS AUTHOR.

    Or maybe –> THE GODS WOULD BE DISPLEASED, AND I IMAGINE THAT THE AUDITORS WOULD BE AS WELL. EVEN I HAVE NEVER MANAGED TO ANNOY ALL OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME.

    Good job capturing Death! He really is the greatest character! But yes, the universe would implode if Pratchett’s Death stepped into the DL world!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top