I know that there will be far greater kings of far greater kingdoms than Latinus of Latium, my father. Upriver at Seven Hills there used to be two little fortified places with dirt walls, Janiculum and Saturnia; then some Greek settlers came, rebuilt on the hillside, and called their fort and town Pallanteum. My poet tried to describe to me that place as he knew it when when he was alive, or will know it when he lives, I should say, for although he was dying when he came to me, and has been dead a long time now, he hasn’t yet been born. He is among those who wait on the far side of the forgetful river. He hasn’t forgotten me yet, but he will, when at last he comes to be born, swimming across that milky water. When he first imagines me he won’t know that he is yet to meet me in the forest of Albunea. Anyhow, he told me that in time to come, where that village is now, the Seven Hills and the valleys among the hills and all the river banks will be covered for miles with an unimaginable city. There will be temples of marble splendid with gold on the hilltops, wide arched gates, innumerable figures carved of marble and bronze; more people will pass through the Forum of that city in a single day, he said, than I will see in all the towns and farmsteads, on all the roads, in all the festivals and battlefields of Latium, in all my life. The king of that city will be the great ruler of the world, so great that he will despise the name of king and be known only as the one made great with holy power, the august. All the peoples of all the lands will bow to him and bring tribute. I believe this, knowing that my poet always speaks the truth, if not always the whole truth. Not even a poet can speak the whole truth.
But in my girlhood his great city was a rough little town built up against the slope of a rocky hill full of caves and overgrown with thick scrub. I went there once with my father, a day’s sail up the river on the west wind. The king there, Evander, an ally of ours, was an exile from Greece, and in some trouble here too — he had killed a guest. He’d had sufficient reason for it, but that sort of thing doesn’t get forgotten by our country folk. He was grateful for my father’s favor and did his best to entertain us, but he lived far more poorly than our wealthy farmers. Pallanteum was a dark stockade, huddled under trees between the wide yellow river and the forested hills. They gave us a feast, of course, beef and venison, but served it very strangely: we had to lie down on benches at small tables, instead of sitting all together at one long table. That was the Greek fashion. And they didn’t keep the sacred salt and meal on the table. That worried me all through the meal.
Evander’s son Pallas, who was about my age, eleven or twelve then, a nice boy, told me a story about a huge beast-man that used to live up there in one of the caves and came out in twilight to steal cattle and tear people to pieces. He was seldom seen, but left great footprints. A Greek hero called Ercles came by and killed the beast-man. What was he called? I asked, and Pallas said Cacus. I knew that that meant the fire-lord, the chief man of a tribal settlement, who kept Vesta alight for the people of the neighborhood, with the help of his daughters, as my father did. But I didn’t want to contradict the Greeks’ story of the beast-man, which was more exciting than mine.
Pallas asked me if I’d like to see a she-wolf’s den, and I said yes, and he took me to a cave called the Lupercal, quite near the village. It was sacred to Pan, he said, which seemed to be what the Greeks called our grandfather Faunus. Anyhow, the settlers let the wolf and her cubs alone, wisely, and she let them alone too. She never even hurt their dogs, though wolves hate dogs. There were plenty of deer for her in those hills. Now and then in spring she’d take a lamb. They counted that as sacrifice, and when she didn’t take a lamb, they’d sacrifice a dog to her. Her mate had disappeared this past winter.
It was not the wisest thing perhaps for two children to stand at the mouth of her den, for she had cubs, and she was there. The cave smelled very strong. It was black dark inside, and silent. But as I grew used to the dark I saw the two small, unmoving fires of her eyes. She stood there between us and her children.
Pallas and I backed away slowly, our gaze always on her eyes. I did not want to go, though I knew I should. I turned at last and followed Pallas, but slowly, looking back often to see if the she-wolf would come out of her house and stand there dark and stiff-legged, the loving mother, the fierce queen.
***
That’s from Lavinia by Ursula K LeGuin, which I haven’t read. I don’t, as a rule, much like LeGuin’s novels — The Tombs of Atuan is an exception — but I think she writes beautiful prose. I went looking for an excerpt from one of LeGuin’s books and there it was. What do you think?
I think it’s great, and I think it’s great in a very specific way — it’s simpler than some of LeGuin’s writing, or it gives that impression, because she’s writing from the pov of a child. The first paragraph is actually in a different style from the next part. When LeGuin begins writing from the child’s pove, her language becomes simpler, her paragraphs and sentences shorter, and there’s less punctuation. She’s demonstrating how to establish voice without dialogue (well, basically without dialogue), while doing a summary. LeGuin is also demonstrating how to tell rather than show. This is all telling. It’s effective telling. I like everything about it.
She’s also got two especially evocative sentences or phrases in this very brief excerpt. The first is: Not even a poet can speak the whole truth. That’s a statement with impact. It’s preceded by a series of much longer sentences and then there’s a break after it — LeGuin is giving this sentence as much impact as possible.
The other is the loving mother, the fierce queen. Given the story that’s going to be told that’s surely a deliberate preview of where the child narrator is heading.
Here’s the description of the book:
In The Aeneid, Vergil’s hero fights to claim the king’s daughter, Lavinia, with whom he is destined to found an empire. Lavinia herself never speaks a word. Now, Ursula K. Le Guin gives Lavinia a voice in a novel that takes us to the half-wild world of ancient Italy, when Rome was a muddy village near seven hills.
Lavinia grows up knowing nothing but peace and freedom, until suitors come. Her mother wants her to marry handsome, ambitious Turnus. But omens and prophecies spoken by the sacred springs say she must marry a foreigner—that she will be the cause of a bitter war—and that her husband will not live long. When a fleet of Trojan ships sails up the Tiber, Lavinia decides to take her destiny into her own hands. And so she tells us what Vergil did not: the story of her life, and of the love of her life.
I would probably really enjoy this, depending on how emphatic the tragic elements are. I have a sample, I believe.
> She’s demonstrating how to establish voice without dialogue (well, basically without dialogue), while doing a summary. LeGuin is also demonstrating how to tell rather than show.
There isn’t any actual dialogue, nobody actually speaks, there are just reports of what people said. More telling not showing.
By rights this ought to create distance (hearkening back to a recent post), but it still works. I think that’s in part simply because it’s the beginning, and the reader is being eased into the story, but no doubt there’s other elements I just can’t articulate.
I read Lavinia because it sounded different from her usual work, which I usually don’t finish. I loved this one.
Craig, I wonder if that first paragraph works because the language used is reminiscent, that of someone lingering over memories, bringing the reader into her life. My father, my poet, and so on.
“Not even a poet can speak the whole truth.” This too is foreshadowing.
I love Le Guin’s books. It baffles me, that her style or topics can turn people off. Dispossessed is one of my absolute favourite books. I think I might like living on Anarres.
Ah well. Taste is taste.
I don’t think I’m turned off by either her style, which I admire, or her topics. I haven’t found her characters engaging enough that I want to spend time with them, or her plots engaging enough to compensate for characters I don’t really like.
I loved EARTHSEA back when it was a trilogy. But, other than LAVINIA, I’ve not enjoyed or even finished any other fiction by her. Kept trying, for years. I don’t know what the consistent element is, but something in her writing keeps me from engaging. I do get a lot out of her essays.
I have tried multiple times, over multiple books, to like LeGuin. You’d think she’d be a shoo-in for a reader whose self-described favourite style is lyrical fantasy. And Earthsea, on the description alone, sounds like My Sort Of Thing. But something just doesn’t work for me.
The closest I’ve come to liking her is the short story “The Social Dreaming of the Frin” in the collection Changing Planes (which I picked up hoping that this author was maybe someone I could love short stories from even if I couldn’t get into her novels). But even that one… I couldn’t read and enjoy it twice. It was a great concept and I remember it fondly, but it left me cold on the reread because that’s ALL it was.
I think the problem with all four books I tried of Earthsea is the distance from the characters. I never got to really know or love any of them, even to the point of “is this person a main character?” and therefore, why should I care? (Although part of that might be that I lost interest in that quoted excerpt before the end of the first paragraph. It was like that all the way through Earthsea…) And since Earthsea is the one that appeals most plotwise, and I just COULD NOT get into it, I’m not bothering with anything else.
I really should try the anime film of Earthsea sometime. I have heard it’s not great, but I like anime and it’s got to be more engaging than the book. At least for me.
I love LeGuin for very different reasons than I love most of my other favourite authors. For me, her books are more about intriguing ideas than about emotional resonance. (But the Tombs of Atuan is definitely my favourite of the Earthsea trilogy because I could get emotionally attached to the main character.) It helps that I read her as a teen and she was one of my introductions to speculative fiction. (I remember being so struck by the dilemma posed by slower-than-light-speed travel in Rocannon’s World.) It’s been a while since I’ve chosen to reread any LeGuin; if I do again it will probably be The Dispossessed, which has such an effective structure and such a nuanced way of presenting social/political ideas, and I did like that main character too.
I found Lavinia beautifully written but a bit boring